Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch semantics for process.executable.name #306

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 3, 2025

Conversation

christos68k
Copy link
Member

@christos68k christos68k commented Jan 14, 2025

Summary

process.executable.name is now the base executable name, instead of process name.

TODO:

1. Use newly introduced key (process.name) for process name No consensus in semconv for that key, yet.

We can review/merge this PR now and introduce process.name if/when it gets merged in semconv.

Also see:

@christos68k christos68k requested review from a team as code owners January 14, 2025 21:34
@christos68k christos68k force-pushed the ck/process/executable branch from 227cdf3 to dfd4074 Compare January 14, 2025 21:38
@christos68k christos68k marked this pull request as draft January 14, 2025 21:43

Verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature. The key has expired.
Is now the base executable name, instead of process name.
@christos68k christos68k force-pushed the ck/process/executable branch from dfd4074 to 2c62db7 Compare February 28, 2025 01:50
@christos68k christos68k self-assigned this Feb 28, 2025
@christos68k christos68k marked this pull request as ready for review February 28, 2025 01:56
@christos68k christos68k merged commit 0b71117 into main Mar 3, 2025
13 of 24 checks passed
@christos68k christos68k deleted the ck/process/executable branch March 3, 2025 14:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants